In the
article “Globalization of Culture through the Media”, Kraidy
(2002) discusses the idea of the diametrical perspectives between cultural
imperialism and globalization of culture. He states that at one end,
cultural imperialism is the enlargement of the prevalent communication theories
of media influence controlled by the government that
often assume a movement toward homogenous culture and a disregard for the
importance of understanding the local culture. On the other end, globalization
is conveyed as a process of exchanging information freely among individuals who
can create infinite meanings from the actual cultural product. With the use of
existing theories and research results, Kraidy concludes that the middle ground
between cultural imperialism and globalization recognizes the critical role
that global media play in the process of hybridization, in terms of intensity
and speed.
I agree
with Kraidy when he suggests cultural globalization as hybridization that pays
attention to the local audience preferences instead of cultural imperialism
that promotes homogenous culture. Kraidy assumes that the audience-recipient of
media messages have the power to interpret and assign meanings to the imported
media message based on their own cultural beliefs and attitudes. Thus, the
media eventually have to indigenize to meet the audience’s needs and wants.
This is
evident in countries such as India, a country that inculcates strong national
culture, and where the government has made the media to act in accordance to
the Indians' needs and wants. For instance, the main foreign satellite channels
such as Star TV are forced to adopt Hindi-language programming as Hindi is the
most widely spoken language in India. The
Indian market was estimated to account for 55 per cent of STAR TV’s revenues in
Asia at the time (Jacob, 2002 cited by Chang,
2007). Another example is the globalization of the film Spiderman 3, which illustrates how mass media
successfully have adapted to the Indian’s local culture. The reason Spiderman 3 became
the biggest-ever
Hollywood hit in India is due to the indigenization that dubbed the Hollywood film into four main Indian languages (Press, 2007). This shows that mass media hybridized but not completely homogenized the culture.
In
conclusion, globalization through media should not be deemed as a process of
complete homogenization. Depending on the circumstances, the driving forces
behind globalization homogenization can be weak. Hence, I believe that cultural
identity is not something that can be easily changed and destroyed by the
globalized media. The way imported media works is by adding and mixing the
cultural elements without eliminating the uniqueness and dominating the local
culture.
Words: 421
References
Chang, Y.-l. (2007). The role of the nation-state: Evolution
of STAR TV in China and India. Globa Media Journal, 2.
Kraidy, M. M. (2002). Globalization
of Culture Through the Media. Retrieved from
http://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1333&context=asc_papers
Press, A. (28 May, 2007). 'Spider-Man 3' biggest-ever
Hollywood hit in India, sinks 'Titanic'. Retrieved from Pravda.ru:
http://english.pravda.ru/news/society
No comments:
Post a Comment